If Puma Punka was built by hand tools, then how come local legend says it was built in one day by "flying gods?" That certainly makes no sense. Is this related to the Nazca Lines somehow, which can only be seen from a great height? Undoubtedly there is some relation... we just do not really know what this is!
According to local legends, ancient gods flew in and built Puma Punku in a single 'long night', whatever that means! Then, the same gods, or other gods, were somehow unhappy with the work. They levitated the stones into the air and spun them over and then dropped them all, where they still lie to this day. This was supposedly accompanied by a lot of noise.
This does not fit the idea of people with stone hammers bashing away at the rocks! In Ancient Aliens Debunked, it is pointed out that Ancient Mystery TV shows fail to point out the presence of evidence nearby that this was bashed out of rock with primitive tool, I.E. stone mauls and then grinders to smooth it out.
The 'evidence' presented is a rock which appears to have been abandoned but which used this technique. I would say this is NOT by the same builders. Think about it. You have completed your temple, or whatever it was supposed to have been. You are then supposed to have LEFT THIS BUILDING REFUSE LYING AROUND... INDEFINITELY?! I doubt it. This was supposed to have been an unimaginably amazing temple, accoridng to wikipedia... and there was a rubbish heap next to it? Was it never completed? What is going on here?
A deeper look at the evidence shows that the entire site was worked over by low-tech as well as high-tech people. Examples of low tech include the low-tech inscriptions placed on the otherwise high-tech Gate of the Sun.
Look also at Kalasasaya semi-subterranean Temple. It is obviously made up of blocks which were once huge. It is really cut-up sandstone which then filled around the edges of a huge rectangular set of standing stones similar in shape to the Rudestone monolith in Yorkshire. Of course the builders of the outline of what was later converted into this temple, and the Rudestone monolith may be one and the same!
The whole site is a high-tech one contaminated with later low-tech building works, which are cuttings from the high-tech site. In, for intance, some time during the past ten thousand years, pyramid-building Viracocha reached the site and took the huge red sandstone blocks (goodness knows how they were hauled up the mountain) and then cut them up to build the Akapana pyramid!
Anomalies at Puma Punku! Ultimate age pushing 80,000 BC?
There are some glaring anomalies which no-one mentions!
The following are anomalies which not many people talk about regarding Puma Punku! In summary, of the conclusions, it would seem that Puma Punku is ridiculously ancient. Furthermore, Pumu Punku is the relic of the original city on the site. In the video, below, I suggest it is of enormous antiquity. We do not know what sort of building it was. It would seem that EVERYTHING on the site was built out of the ruins of Puma Punku. This would include Tiwanaku, which Arthur Posnansky dated astronomically to 17,000 years of age! The Lion Gate of Tiwanaku is of course built from a gate of Puma Punku! The entire Tiwanaku site is garbage comapred to the majesty of what Puma Punku must have once been!
In fact, Tiwanaku/Puma Punku is so ridiculously old that it must have been a Port City in a time of very high-sea level! It is now on top of a mountain? Was it the Port City during the flood?!
Ridiculously Large Block!
Bizarrely, there was a 40m x 7m x ?m deep block, obviously geopolymer, once solid and not cut from rocks at the site. One simply cannot lift the thing! I found out about this enormous block at Puma Punku by reading Eric Von Daniken's amazing 'Stones of Kiribati'. (In fact I believe that all of his books are worth reading... and am working through each one! They get better as you go along!) Daniken mentions that this enormous block was once one. According to modern archaeology this stone would have to have been hauled up the mountain and quarried at least 15 km (or 60km) away! This makes no sense. It was either sailed to Tiwanaku via the port, which is now 20km from Lake Titicaca, or it is in fact simply geopolymer.
The block is face down yet why are its constituent pieces now held together with clamps? This makes little sense! Was it once a wall or a ceiling? Possibly?
Who made the clamps, high-tech or low tech?
Across Puma Punku we see that there is space for metal clamps to have been inserted between stones, I suppose in some effort to hold them together. Who did this? Conquistadors? Archaeologist? Both are possibilities! They made a 'repair' by using clamps or something to 'hold the blocks together?' This is so useless and the original builders would not have bothered for their blocks already would have been cut or poured exactly the way they wanted them! Yet everyone erroneously thinks this is original?
Who built the metal clamps and where are they? Anyone selling metal I suppose... They seem to have been removed from the stones they once held. Could this have been used as a church by conquistadors who were worried about further earthquakes affecting the structure? What is going on here?! This makes absolutely no sense! The questions could go on and on, endlessly!
Tiwanaku door taken from Puma Punku
The Sun Gate door of Tiwanaku, as well as the Moon Gate Door looks like the rest of Puma Punku with the exception that the carving of the baby sun god, Hercules. This is pretty sloppy and was done by a later people, (much later). To me it seems totally inconsistent with the execution of the rest of the door, which was obviously done by the Puma Punku people.
The Tiwanaku Sun Gate also contains side slots which are found on the Infamous Seventh Door at Padaswamy Temple in India which I have also suggested is a kind of research facility or temple.
What is the foot bath?
In the enormous stone at Pumu Punku there is a cut square basin. There appear to be steps leading out of this! These are tiny steps leading out of a foot bath, which may have been used for decontamination purposes, so were these people actually four foot tall? Or is it in fact something else? Is it a scale model of a courtyard? In fact the Book of Enoch, which I reckon to be incredibly ancient, seems to have Enoch talking about scale models of the surrounds of temples and so forth, which is weird. I mention this because the book seems to derive from some ancient era of space travel.
Skyscrapers are also depicted on the reliefs which look like the Petronas Tower, in Malaysia. No-one mentions this!
1) Puma Punku looks nothing like most of the artefacts at Tiwanaku, ergo Tiwanaku was built from the RUINS of Puma Punku and goodness knows what else!
2) Puma Punku also looks NOTHING like ANYTHING else in Peru. Peru seems to have been a mountain world-fortress in ancient times. Even all the other stuff in Peru which is high technology was from tens of thousands of years after Puma Punku was built!
If Puma Punku was built in 536AD as is claimed, it would match everything else in Peru. It does not! The world was in fact in a HUGE catastrophe in that time! No-one built anything!